synthetic- and analytic understanding

If a person has a bad behavior, you may understand his action by analyzing what he has done. You may give reasonable understand to how the behavior turned bad but still, you would never do the same. You would be a spectator giving analytical knowledge to the situation. A synthetic understanding would mean that you would be able to do the same as the other person. This is not only a question of analyzing the behavior but bringing aesthetic- and ethical reasoning into the understanding. A synthetic understanding is an physical engagement, a participation into the behavior. Human are not able to have a true synthetic understanding of bad behavior. Human can only have synthetic understanding of behavior we would be able to wholeheartedly imitate and improve. A synthetic understanding gives insight and not only analytical knowledge.

Experience and understanding

To understand is just a small part of an experience. When we experience a phenomenon we often search for understanding. But a true experience is being with a phenomenon, to participate in the world, and not being a spectator analyzing the world. To experience is to engage in the world, which brings forth a synthetic kind of understanding.

Dogma and Data

If knowledge is power it must be based on dogma and not data. Data dilute knowledge and turns it into information without a form. Knowledge based on data removes the idea of form or essence. Data is volatile and changing. This deformational knowledge is doxa. Knowledge as episteme must be based on human’s inner cognition. The experience of acknowledge a dogma is a synthesis of reasoning, emotions, moral and action.

Metaphor

A metaphor is an attempt to express a insight. Essential thoughts are verbalized by metaphors. A metaphor will never exist and have a content if it is not something real that it is trying to tell us. What it tries to portray is a core we are able to sight, but not see. We are not able to express this truth in words of direct correspondence, so we have to resort to images and fables. The more abstract a insight is, the more metaphorical is our language. No one has used metaphors better than Plato, but neither has anyone else struggled more to free one selves from this use.

Human recognition

The essence of human recognition is a sensation of knowing what a human is, when turning Others in to You. This is a holistic sensation of recognizing others existence. Recognition is not about rewarding or praising. This is just a kind of reinforcement that splits the human being into pieces of competences and turns the experience of recognition into manipulation. Recognition of existence is a fight on life and death. Recognition as reinforcement is a constant feeling of never being able to be good enough.

Autonomy and the room of action

The essence of autonomy is will. This is a human lot. Human can not choose to have a will or not, and no one are able to remove or reduce a humans will. It is still you who have autonomy and must choose. Human my feel that their ability to chose by them self are being reduced or increased, but this is not a question of autonomy or not. Your room of action might move, but your autonomy will remain the same. If you are not satisfied with your room of action this is your autonomy speaking and fighting against the external restrictions trying to tell you how to act.

life is great deeds

The essence of life can not be captured by words but it can be known by great deeds. Words can reveal the cracks in life. Great deed are the light that comes through the cracks. To know the light you must love great deeds that touch you by hart. We are surrounded by great deeds, and even some wordly poiesis are great deeds that do touch our hart.